Legend spotlight · Vendetta

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

18 decks · avg 7.4 match points

← Set spotlight

Most points · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Most match points on a card

Sum of pilots' match points for each Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness list containing this card.

Points banked: 114
Decks: 15
Avg pts when present: 7.6 · 83.3% of lists

Most played · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Most lists ran it

The Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness staple — in the most of these decks.

Points banked: 114
Decks: 15
Avg pts when present: 7.6 · 83.3% of lists

Hidden gem · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Hidden gem

Few Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness lists ran it, but those pilots beat the Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness average.

Points banked: 30
Decks: 2
Lift vs event mean: +7.6 pts · event 7.4 · avg 15.0 · 11.1% of lists

Underperformer · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Staple under average

Common in Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness decks, yet its pilots fell below the Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness average.

Points banked: 30
Decks: 6
Gap under event mean: −2.4 pts vs event 7.4 · avg 5.0 · 33.3% of lists

Mana curve

0.6

0

3.9

1

15.8

2

6.1

3

2.6

4

4.1

5

6.0

6+

Card types

Spell44.9%
Unit42.3%
Gear12.8%

Rune base

Mind6.7/deck
Order5.3/deck

Game plans

Best avg: Midrange (8.8 pts)

Midrange

55.6% · 10 decks · avg 8.8

Control

22.2% · 4 decks · avg 6.3

Ramp/Hold

22.2% · 4 decks · avg 5.3

How game plans are classified

A tunable heuristic reads each deck’s mana curve, unit/spell mix, and card-text keywords (removal, draw, channel/ramp), then assigns the first plan that fits — in order Aggro → Ramp → Control, otherwise Midrange:

Aggro/Tempo — low curve (avg cost ≲ 2.7), mostly units, many 1–2-cost units; pressures early.
Ramp/Hold — several channel/ramp effects with a higher curve (avg ≳ 3.2); accelerates to bigger, later plays.
Control — higher curve (avg ≳ 3) with lots of removal + card draw and few cheap units; grinds the game out.
Midrange — balanced curve and unit/spell mix; the default when no other plan fits.

Auto-includes

Core cards

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness cards in at least half of these decks — the skeleton to start from.

1
114 pts · 15 decks · avg 7.6 · 83.3% · ×2.5
83.3%of decks
2
101 pts · 14 decks · avg 7.2 · 77.8% · ×2.5
77.8%of decks
3
94 pts · 13 decks · avg 7.2 · 72.2% · ×2.3
72.2%of decks
4
86 pts · 12 decks · avg 7.2 · 66.7% · ×1.8
66.7%of decks
5
107 pts · 11 decks · avg 9.7 · 61.1% · ×2.1
61.1%of decks
6
90 pts · 11 decks · avg 8.2 · 61.1% · ×2.0
61.1%of decks
7
80 pts · 11 decks · avg 7.3 · 61.1% · ×2.9
61.1%of decks
8
83 pts · 10 decks · avg 8.3 · 55.6% · ×2.8
55.6%of decks

Free / tech slots

Flex tech

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness cards in a minority of decks, ranked by their pilots’ match points — the contested slots where your choices matter.

1
30 pts · 2 decks · avg 15.0 · 11.1% · ×2.0
15.0avg pts
2
24 pts · 2 decks · avg 12.0 · 11.1% · ×2.5
12.0avg pts
3
23 pts · 2 decks · avg 11.5 · 11.1% · ×2.0
11.5avg pts
4
21 pts · 2 decks · avg 10.5 · 11.1% · ×2.0
10.5avg pts
5
47 pts · 5 decks · avg 9.4 · 27.8% · ×1.6
9.4avg pts
6
75 pts · 8 decks · avg 9.4 · 44.4% · ×2.9
9.4avg pts
7
37 pts · 4 decks · avg 9.3 · 22.2% · ×2.8
9.3avg pts
8
34 pts · 4 decks · avg 8.5 · 22.2% · ×2.5
8.5avg pts

Low share, hot lists

Hidden gems

1
30 pts · 2 decks · avg 15.0 · 11.1% · ×2.0
+7.6vs event
2
24 pts · 2 decks · avg 12.0 · 11.1% · ×2.5
+4.6vs event
3
23 pts · 2 decks · avg 11.5 · 11.1% · ×2.0
+4.1vs event
4
21 pts · 2 decks · avg 10.5 · 11.1% · ×2.0
+3.1vs event
5
17 pts · 2 decks · avg 8.5 · 11.1% · ×1.0
+1.1vs event
6
25 pts · 3 decks · avg 8.3 · 16.7% · ×1.3
+0.9vs event
7
24 pts · 3 decks · avg 8.0 · 16.7% · ×3.0
+0.6vs event
8
15 pts · 2 decks · avg 7.5 · 11.1% · ×2.5
+0.1vs event

High share, cold lists

Underperforming staples

1
30 pts · 6 decks · avg 5.0 · 33.3% · ×2.3
−2.4vs event
2
20 pts · 4 decks · avg 5.0 · 22.2% · ×2.0
−2.4vs event
3
54 pts · 9 decks · avg 6.0 · 50% · ×1.4
−1.4vs event
4
36 pts · 6 decks · avg 6.0 · 33.3% · ×2.8
−1.4vs event
5
24 pts · 4 decks · avg 6.0 · 22.2% · ×2.0
−1.4vs event
6
31 pts · 5 decks · avg 6.2 · 27.8% · ×2.8
−1.2vs event
7
38 pts · 6 decks · avg 6.3 · 33.3% · ×2.5
−1.1vs event
8
86 pts · 12 decks · avg 7.2 · 66.7% · ×1.8
−0.3vs event

Locations

Battlefields

Battlefields these decks bring, by how often they appear. (Battlefield data is still patchy and fills in as the catalog improves.)

No battlefields resolved for these decks yet.

Out of the main deck

Sideboard

1
102 pts · 13 decks · avg 7.8 · 72.2% · ×2.4
72.2%of decks
2
68 pts · 8 decks · avg 8.5 · 44.4% · ×1.8
44.4%of decks
3
57 pts · 8 decks · avg 7.1 · 44.4% · ×1.6
44.4%of decks
4
51 pts · 6 decks · avg 8.5 · 33.3% · ×1.3
33.3%of decks
5
26 pts · 5 decks · avg 5.2 · 27.8% · ×1.8
27.8%of decks
6
41 pts · 4 decks · avg 10.3 · 22.2% · ×1.5
22.2%of decks
7
35 pts · 4 decks · avg 8.8 · 22.2% · ×1.0
22.2%of decks
8
30 pts · 4 decks · avg 7.5 · 22.2% · ×1.0
22.2%of decks

Score gravity

Top cards by points

1
114 pts · 15 decks · avg 7.6 · 83.3% · ×2.5
114
2
107 pts · 11 decks · avg 9.7 · 61.1% · ×2.1
107
3
101 pts · 14 decks · avg 7.2 · 77.8% · ×2.5
101
4
94 pts · 13 decks · avg 7.2 · 72.2% · ×2.3
94
5
90 pts · 11 decks · avg 8.2 · 61.1% · ×2.0
90
6
86 pts · 12 decks · avg 7.2 · 66.7% · ×1.8
86
7
83 pts · 10 decks · avg 8.3 · 55.6% · ×2.8
83
8
80 pts · 11 decks · avg 7.3 · 61.1% · ×2.9
80

Ubiquity

Top cards by lists

1
114 pts · 15 decks · avg 7.6 · 83.3% · ×2.5
15
2
101 pts · 14 decks · avg 7.2 · 77.8% · ×2.5
14
3
94 pts · 13 decks · avg 7.2 · 72.2% · ×2.3
13
4
86 pts · 12 decks · avg 7.2 · 66.7% · ×1.8
12
5
107 pts · 11 decks · avg 9.7 · 61.1% · ×2.1
11
6
90 pts · 11 decks · avg 8.2 · 61.1% · ×2.0
11
7
80 pts · 11 decks · avg 7.3 · 61.1% · ×2.9
11
8
83 pts · 10 decks · avg 8.3 · 55.6% · ×2.8
10

Tip jar

If this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!

Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness · Vendetta legend spotlight