Set card spotlight

Vendetta

Across 3 regional qualifiers in Vendetta

Players in standings

12071

Everyone who appears in the standings export we used for this cut.

Decklists we used

1479

Registrations where we successfully loaded a deck with at least one card.

Different cards seen

561

Unique main-deck card names across those decklists (battlefields, runes & sideboard counted separately).

Colors & domains

Domain breakdown

Pick a domain to swap the whole analysis to that color, then a support domain to drill into the exact pair — core cards, game plans, and the cards that over/under-perform.

Metagame by primary domain

Each deck counts toward the domain it plays most. Field average is 11.3 match points.

Domain	Decks	Pts share	Avg pts
Calm	512 · 34.6%	33.9%	11.1
Chaos	391 · 26.4%	28.7%	12.3
Body	199 · 13.5%	13.1%	11.0
Mind	173 · 11.7%	10.2%	9.9
Order	124 · 8.4%	8.9%	12.0
Fury	80 · 5.4%	5.1%	10.7

Mana curve · all decks

0.4

0

7.6

1

15.0

2

6.9

3

4.1

4

1.9

5

3.2

6+

Card types · all decks

Spell44.6%
Unit43%
Gear12.3%

Total match points on lists

Most match points on a card

Add up every player’s match points for each list that contains this card at least once — the heavy lifters across the field.

Points banked: 6,803
Decks: 609
Avg pts when present: 11.2 · 41.2% of lists

Share of loaded lists

Most lists ran it

How many distinct resolved decklists include the card at least once — your staple / saturation read.

Points banked: 6,803
Decks: 609
Avg pts when present: 11.2 · 41.2% of lists

Rare but winning lists

Hidden gem

Low share of lists, but players who registered it averaged higher match points than the rest of the resolved field.

Points banked: 47
Decks: 2
Lift vs event mean: +12.2 pts · event 11.3 · avg 23.5 · 0.1% of lists

Popular but cold lists

Staple under average

Showed up on a large share of lists, yet players who ran it averaged below the mean for everyone whose deck loaded.

Points banked: 3,227
Decks: 310
Gap under event mean: −0.9 pts vs event 11.3 · avg 10.4 · 21% of lists

Same card leads both totals and ubiquity — the defining piece of this field.

Vendetta · resolved field

Across only the decklists we successfully loaded, players averaged 11.3 match points. Together they account for 16,731 match points in standings — that pool is what every “points banked” bar is built from (each card inherits whole-player totals, so sums across cards intentionally exceed this once).

Low share, hot lists

Hidden gems

At most ~22% of resolved lists (at least 2 players), with list averages above the field mean of 11.3 match points.

1
47 pts · 2 decks · avg 23.5 · 0.1% · ×1.0
+12.2vs event
2
33 pts · 2 decks · avg 16.5 · 0.1% · ×1.5
+5.2vs event
3
51 pts · 3 decks · avg 17.0 · 0.2% · ×1.7
+5.7vs event
4
30 pts · 2 decks · avg 15.0 · 0.1% · ×1.0
+3.7vs event
5
28 pts · 2 decks · avg 14.0 · 0.1% · ×2.0
+2.7vs event
6
27 pts · 2 decks · avg 13.5 · 0.1% · ×2.5
+2.2vs event
7
27 pts · 2 decks · avg 13.5 · 0.1% · ×1.0
+2.2vs event
8
174 pts · 11 decks · avg 15.8 · 0.7% · ×1.1
+4.5vs event

High share, cold lists

Staples below average

At least ~18% of resolved lists (min. 4 players), but list averages sit under the same field mean.

1
3,227 pts · 310 decks · avg 10.4 · 21% · ×2.9
−0.9vs event
2
3,060 pts · 294 decks · avg 10.4 · 19.9% · ×2.0
−0.9vs event
3
3,527 pts · 330 decks · avg 10.7 · 22.3% · ×2.2
−0.6vs event
4
3,099 pts · 288 decks · avg 10.8 · 19.5% · ×1.9
−0.6vs event
5
2,901 pts · 269 decks · avg 10.8 · 18.2% · ×2.2
−0.5vs event
6
6,803 pts · 609 decks · avg 11.2 · 41.2% · ×2.9
−0.1vs event
7
4,314 pts · 386 decks · avg 11.2 · 26.1% · ×2.0
−0.1vs event
8
6,386 pts · 566 decks · avg 11.3 · 38.3% · ×2.9
−0.0vs event

Score gravity

Top cards by points on lists

1
6,803 pts · 609 decks · avg 11.2 · 41.2% · ×2.9
6,803
2
6,386 pts · 566 decks · avg 11.3 · 38.3% · ×2.9
6,386
3
5,649 pts · 468 decks · avg 12.1 · 31.6% · ×1.9
5,649
4
4,874 pts · 397 decks · avg 12.3 · 26.8% · ×2.1
4,874
5
4,607 pts · 397 decks · avg 11.6 · 26.8% · ×2.9
4,607
6
4,314 pts · 386 decks · avg 11.2 · 26.1% · ×2.0
4,314
7
4,314 pts · 337 decks · avg 12.8 · 22.8% · ×2.3
4,314
8
4,257 pts · 375 decks · avg 11.4 · 25.4% · ×2.6
4,257
9
4,087 pts · 354 decks · avg 11.5 · 23.9% · ×2.1
4,087
10
3,769 pts · 329 decks · avg 11.5 · 22.2% · ×2.7
3,769
11
3,624 pts · 300 decks · avg 12.1 · 20.3% · ×2.0
3,624
12
3,527 pts · 330 decks · avg 10.7 · 22.3% · ×2.2
3,527
13
3,437 pts · 267 decks · avg 12.9 · 18.1% · ×1.8
3,437
14
3,302 pts · 282 decks · avg 11.7 · 19.1% · ×2.2
3,302
15
3,248 pts · 285 decks · avg 11.4 · 19.3% · ×2.1
3,248
16
3,245 pts · 278 decks · avg 11.7 · 18.8% · ×2.8
3,245
17
3,227 pts · 310 decks · avg 10.4 · 21% · ×2.9
3,227
18
3,190 pts · 245 decks · avg 13.0 · 16.6% · ×1.5
3,190
19
3,099 pts · 288 decks · avg 10.8 · 19.5% · ×1.9
3,099
20
3,060 pts · 294 decks · avg 10.4 · 19.9% · ×2.0
3,060

Ubiquity

Top cards by how many lists

1
6,803 pts · 609 decks · avg 11.2 · 41.2% · ×2.9
609
2
6,386 pts · 566 decks · avg 11.3 · 38.3% · ×2.9
566
3
5,649 pts · 468 decks · avg 12.1 · 31.6% · ×1.9
468
4
4,874 pts · 397 decks · avg 12.3 · 26.8% · ×2.1
397
5
4,607 pts · 397 decks · avg 11.6 · 26.8% · ×2.9
397
6
4,314 pts · 386 decks · avg 11.2 · 26.1% · ×2.0
386
7
4,257 pts · 375 decks · avg 11.4 · 25.4% · ×2.6
375
8
4,087 pts · 354 decks · avg 11.5 · 23.9% · ×2.1
354
9
4,314 pts · 337 decks · avg 12.8 · 22.8% · ×2.3
337
10
3,527 pts · 330 decks · avg 10.7 · 22.3% · ×2.2
330
11
3,769 pts · 329 decks · avg 11.5 · 22.2% · ×2.7
329
12
3,227 pts · 310 decks · avg 10.4 · 21% · ×2.9
310
13
3,624 pts · 300 decks · avg 12.1 · 20.3% · ×2.0
300
14
3,060 pts · 294 decks · avg 10.4 · 19.9% · ×2.0
294
15
3,099 pts · 288 decks · avg 10.8 · 19.5% · ×1.9
288
16
3,248 pts · 285 decks · avg 11.4 · 19.3% · ×2.1
285
17
3,302 pts · 282 decks · avg 11.7 · 19.1% · ×2.2
282
18
3,245 pts · 278 decks · avg 11.7 · 18.8% · ×2.8
278
19
2,901 pts · 269 decks · avg 10.8 · 18.2% · ×2.2
269
20
3,437 pts · 267 decks · avg 12.9 · 18.1% · ×1.8
267

Tip jar

If this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!

Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.