Card spotlight
Card points and play rate from registered decklists at this regional.
Riftbound Regional Qualifier: Utrecht · Sat, Jun 13, 2026 – Jun 14, 2026 · Jaarbeursplein 6, 3521 AZ Utrecht, Netherlands
Players in standings
1953
Everyone who appears in the standings export we used for this cut.
Decklists we used
1439
Registrations where we successfully loaded a deck with at least one card.
Different cards seen
456
Unique main-deck card names across those decklists (battlefields, runes & sideboard counted separately).
Colors & domains
Domain breakdown
Pick a domain to swap the whole analysis to that color, then a support domain to drill into the exact pair — core cards, game plans, and the cards that over/under-perform.
Metagame by primary domain
Each deck counts toward the domain it plays most. Field average is 12.2 match points.
| Domain | Decks | Pts share | Avg pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 423 · 29.4% | 30.4% | 12.6 | |
| 380 · 26.4% | 24.1% | 11.2 | |
| 246 · 17.1% | 19.6% | 14.0 | |
| 198 · 13.8% | 13.8% | 12.3 | |
| 130 · 9% | 8.2% | 11.1 | |
| 62 · 4.3% | 3.9% | 11.0 |
Mana curve · all decks
Card types · all decks
- Spell46.7%
- Unit42.6%
- Gear10.7%
- Unknown0%
Total match points on lists
Most match points on a card
Add up every player’s match points for each list that contains this card at least once — the heavy lifters across the field.
- Points banked
- 7,120
- Decks
- 585
- Avg pts when present
- 12.2 · 40.7% of lists
Share of loaded lists
Most lists ran it
How many distinct resolved decklists include the card at least once — your staple / saturation read.
- Points banked
- 7,120
- Decks
- 585
- Avg pts when present
- 12.2 · 40.7% of lists
Rare but winning lists
Hidden gem
Low share of lists, but players who registered it averaged higher match points than the rest of the resolved field.
- Points banked
- 42
- Decks
- 2
- Lift vs event mean
- +8.8 pts · event 12.2 · avg 21.0 · 0.1% of lists
Popular but cold lists
Staple under average
Showed up on a large share of lists, yet players who ran it averaged below the mean for everyone whose deck loaded.
- Points banked
- 3,483
- Decks
- 304
- Gap under event mean
- −0.8 pts vs event 12.2 · avg 11.5 · 21.1% of lists
Same card leads both totals and ubiquity — the defining piece of this field.
Utrecht · resolved field
Across only the decklists we successfully loaded, players averaged 12.2 match points. Together they account for 17,615 match points in standings — that pool is what every “points banked” bar is built from (each card inherits whole-player totals, so sums across cards intentionally exceed this once).
Low share, hot lists
Hidden gems
At most ~22% of resolved lists (at least 2 players), with list averages above the field mean of 12.2 match points.
- 1
42 pts · 2 decks · avg 21.0 · 0.1% · ×1.0
+8.8vs event - 2
39 pts · 2 decks · avg 19.5 · 0.1% · ×1.5
+7.3vs event - 3
63 pts · 3 decks · avg 21.0 · 0.2% · ×1.0
+8.8vs event - 4
55 pts · 3 decks · avg 18.3 · 0.2% · ×1.7
+6.1vs event - 5
33 pts · 2 decks · avg 16.5 · 0.1% · ×2.0
+4.3vs event - 6
51 pts · 3 decks · avg 17.0 · 0.2% · ×2.0
+4.8vs event - 7
151 pts · 8 decks · avg 18.9 · 0.6% · ×2.6
+6.6vs event - 8
30 pts · 2 decks · avg 15.0 · 0.1% · ×1.5
+2.8vs event
High share, cold lists
Staples below average
At least ~18% of resolved lists (min. 4 players), but list averages sit under the same field mean.
- 1
3,483 pts · 304 decks · avg 11.5 · 21.1% · ×1.8
−0.8vs event - 2
3,613 pts · 298 decks · avg 12.1 · 20.7% · ×2.4
−0.1vs event - 3
4,628 pts · 381 decks · avg 12.1 · 26.5% · ×2.1
−0.1vs event - 4
7,120 pts · 585 decks · avg 12.2 · 40.7% · ×2.9
−0.1vs event - 5
7,070 pts · 580 decks · avg 12.2 · 40.3% · ×2.9
−0.1vs event
Score gravity
Top cards by points on lists
- 1
7,120 pts · 585 decks · avg 12.2 · 40.7% · ×2.9
7,120 - 2
7,070 pts · 580 decks · avg 12.2 · 40.3% · ×2.9
7,070 - 3
6,495 pts · 512 decks · avg 12.7 · 35.6% · ×2.8
6,495 - 4
6,475 pts · 524 decks · avg 12.4 · 36.4% · ×2.1
6,475 - 5
6,370 pts · 502 decks · avg 12.7 · 34.9% · ×2.1
6,370 - 6
6,140 pts · 494 decks · avg 12.4 · 34.3% · ×2.2
6,140 - 7
5,496 pts · 435 decks · avg 12.6 · 30.2% · ×2.7
5,496 - 8
5,287 pts · 416 decks · avg 12.7 · 28.9% · ×1.9
5,287 - 9
5,241 pts · 382 decks · avg 13.7 · 26.5% · ×2.0
5,241 - 10
5,135 pts · 413 decks · avg 12.4 · 28.7% · ×2.7
5,135 - 11
4,902 pts · 369 decks · avg 13.3 · 25.6% · ×2.1
4,902 - 12
4,628 pts · 381 decks · avg 12.1 · 26.5% · ×2.1
4,628 - 13
4,479 pts · 329 decks · avg 13.6 · 22.9% · ×2.5
4,479 - 14
4,355 pts · 355 decks · avg 12.3 · 24.7% · ×1.9
4,355 - 15
4,239 pts · 324 decks · avg 13.1 · 22.5% · ×2.9
4,239 - 16
3,849 pts · 277 decks · avg 13.9 · 19.2% · ×1.7
3,849 - 17
3,665 pts · 260 decks · avg 14.1 · 18.1% · ×2.0
3,665 - 18
3,635 pts · 285 decks · avg 12.8 · 19.8% · ×1.4
3,635 - 19
3,613 pts · 298 decks · avg 12.1 · 20.7% · ×2.4
3,613 - 20
3,503 pts · 249 decks · avg 14.1 · 17.3% · ×2.7
3,503
Ubiquity
Top cards by how many lists
- 1
7,120 pts · 585 decks · avg 12.2 · 40.7% · ×2.9
585 - 2
7,070 pts · 580 decks · avg 12.2 · 40.3% · ×2.9
580 - 3
6,475 pts · 524 decks · avg 12.4 · 36.4% · ×2.1
524 - 4
6,495 pts · 512 decks · avg 12.7 · 35.6% · ×2.8
512 - 5
6,370 pts · 502 decks · avg 12.7 · 34.9% · ×2.1
502 - 6
6,140 pts · 494 decks · avg 12.4 · 34.3% · ×2.2
494 - 7
5,496 pts · 435 decks · avg 12.6 · 30.2% · ×2.7
435 - 8
5,287 pts · 416 decks · avg 12.7 · 28.9% · ×1.9
416 - 9
5,135 pts · 413 decks · avg 12.4 · 28.7% · ×2.7
413 - 10
5,241 pts · 382 decks · avg 13.7 · 26.5% · ×2.0
382 - 11
4,628 pts · 381 decks · avg 12.1 · 26.5% · ×2.1
381 - 12
4,902 pts · 369 decks · avg 13.3 · 25.6% · ×2.1
369 - 13
4,355 pts · 355 decks · avg 12.3 · 24.7% · ×1.9
355 - 14
4,479 pts · 329 decks · avg 13.6 · 22.9% · ×2.5
329 - 15
4,239 pts · 324 decks · avg 13.1 · 22.5% · ×2.9
324 - 16
3,483 pts · 304 decks · avg 11.5 · 21.1% · ×1.8
304 - 17
3,613 pts · 298 decks · avg 12.1 · 20.7% · ×2.4
298 - 18
3,635 pts · 285 decks · avg 12.8 · 19.8% · ×1.4
285 - 19
3,849 pts · 277 decks · avg 13.9 · 19.2% · ×1.7
277 - 20
3,665 pts · 260 decks · avg 14.1 · 18.1% · ×2.0
260
Tip jar
Back to topIf this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!
Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.