Yomi's Place
Support me

Card spotlight

Card points and play rate from registered decklists at this regional.

Riftbound Regional Qualifier: Utrecht · Sat, Jun 13, 2026 – Jun 14, 2026 · Jaarbeursplein 6, 3521 AZ Utrecht, Netherlands

Players in standings

1953

Everyone who appears in the standings export we used for this cut.

Decklists we used

1489

Registrations where we successfully loaded a deck with at least one card.

Different cards seen

527

Unique card names across those decklists (main + runes, etc.).

Total match points on lists

Most match points on a card

Add up every player’s match points for each list that contains this card at least once — the heavy lifters at this event.

Points banked
7,785
Decks
611
Avg pts when present
12.7 · 41% of lists

Share of loaded lists

Most lists ran it

How many distinct resolved decklists include the card at least once — your staple / saturation read for this event.

Points banked
7,785
Decks
611
Avg pts when present
12.7 · 41% of lists

Rare but winning lists

Hidden gem

Low share of lists here, but players who registered it averaged higher match points than the rest of the resolved field.

Points banked
42
Decks
2
Lift vs event mean
+8.5 pts · event 12.5 · avg 21.0 · 0.1% of lists

Popular but cold lists

Staple under event average

Showed up on a large share of lists, yet players who ran it averaged below the mean for everyone whose deck loaded.

Points banked
4,039
Decks
348
Gap under event mean
−0.9 pts vs event 12.5 · avg 11.6 · 23.4% of lists

Same card leads both totals and ubiquity — the defining piece of this Utrecht event.

Utrecht · resolved field

Across only the decklists we successfully loaded, players averaged 12.5 match points. Together they account for 18,576 match points in standings — that pool is what every “points banked” bar below is built from (each card inherits whole-player totals, so sums across cards intentionally exceed this once).

Low share, hot lists

Hidden gems

At most ~22% of Utrecht lists we resolved (at least 2 players), with list averages above the event mean of 12.5 match points.

  • 1

    42 pts · 2 decks · avg 21.0 · 0.1%

    +8.5vs event
  • 2

    39 pts · 2 decks · avg 19.5 · 0.1%

    +7.0vs event
  • 3

    87 pts · 4 decks · avg 21.8 · 0.3%

    +9.3vs event
  • 4

    87 pts · 4 decks · avg 21.8 · 0.3%

    +9.3vs event
  • 5

    55 pts · 3 decks · avg 18.3 · 0.2%

    +5.9vs event
  • 6

    34 pts · 2 decks · avg 17.0 · 0.1%

    +4.5vs event
  • 7

    54 pts · 3 decks · avg 18.0 · 0.2%

    +5.5vs event
  • 8

    141 pts · 7 decks · avg 20.1 · 0.5%

    +7.7vs event

High share, cold lists

Staples below event average

At least ~18% of resolved Utrecht lists (min. 4 players), but list averages sit under the same event mean.

  • 1

    4,039 pts · 348 decks · avg 11.6 · 23.4%

    −0.9vs event
  • 2

    3,396 pts · 289 decks · avg 11.8 · 19.4%

    −0.7vs event
  • 3

    4,690 pts · 389 decks · avg 12.1 · 26.1%

    −0.4vs event
  • 4

    4,904 pts · 398 decks · avg 12.3 · 26.7%

    −0.2vs event
  • 5

    3,829 pts · 311 decks · avg 12.3 · 20.9%

    −0.2vs event
  • 6

    7,491 pts · 605 decks · avg 12.4 · 40.6%

    −0.1vs event
  • 7

    7,429 pts · 599 decks · avg 12.4 · 40.2%

    −0.1vs event

Score gravity

Top cards by points on lists

Highest sum of player match points attributed to each card (same rule as the lead card above).

  • 1

    7,785 pts · 611 decks · avg 12.7 · 41%

    7,785
  • 2

    7,491 pts · 605 decks · avg 12.4 · 40.6%

    7,491
  • 3

    7,429 pts · 599 decks · avg 12.4 · 40.2%

    7,429
  • 4

    7,111 pts · 565 decks · avg 12.6 · 37.9%

    7,111
  • 5

    6,929 pts · 535 decks · avg 13.0 · 35.9%

    6,929
  • 6

    6,794 pts · 537 decks · avg 12.7 · 36.1%

    6,794
  • 7

    6,702 pts · 522 decks · avg 12.8 · 35.1%

    6,702
  • 8

    6,468 pts · 476 decks · avg 13.6 · 32%

    6,468
  • 9

    5,805 pts · 448 decks · avg 13.0 · 30.1%

    5,805
  • 10

    5,768 pts · 448 decks · avg 12.9 · 30.1%

    5,768
  • 11

    5,647 pts · 399 decks · avg 14.2 · 26.8%

    5,647
  • 12

    5,448 pts · 430 decks · avg 12.7 · 28.9%

    5,448
  • 13

    5,222 pts · 387 decks · avg 13.5 · 26%

    5,222
  • 14

    4,991 pts · 398 decks · avg 12.5 · 26.7%

    4,991
  • 15

    4,907 pts · 350 decks · avg 14.0 · 23.5%

    4,907
  • 16

    4,904 pts · 398 decks · avg 12.3 · 26.7%

    4,904
  • 17

    4,879 pts · 342 decks · avg 14.3 · 23%

    4,879
  • 18

    4,813 pts · 383 decks · avg 12.6 · 25.7%

    4,813
  • 19

    4,690 pts · 389 decks · avg 12.1 · 26.1%

    4,690
  • 20

    4,614 pts · 346 decks · avg 13.3 · 23.2%

    4,614

Ubiquity

Top cards by how many lists

Most distinct resolved decklists containing the card at least once.

  • 1

    7,785 pts · 611 decks · avg 12.7 · 41%

    611
  • 2

    7,491 pts · 605 decks · avg 12.4 · 40.6%

    605
  • 3

    7,429 pts · 599 decks · avg 12.4 · 40.2%

    599
  • 4

    7,111 pts · 565 decks · avg 12.6 · 37.9%

    565
  • 5

    6,794 pts · 537 decks · avg 12.7 · 36.1%

    537
  • 6

    6,929 pts · 535 decks · avg 13.0 · 35.9%

    535
  • 7

    6,702 pts · 522 decks · avg 12.8 · 35.1%

    522
  • 8

    6,468 pts · 476 decks · avg 13.6 · 32%

    476
  • 9

    5,805 pts · 448 decks · avg 13.0 · 30.1%

    448
  • 10

    5,768 pts · 448 decks · avg 12.9 · 30.1%

    448
  • 11

    5,448 pts · 430 decks · avg 12.7 · 28.9%

    430
  • 12

    5,647 pts · 399 decks · avg 14.2 · 26.8%

    399
  • 13

    4,991 pts · 398 decks · avg 12.5 · 26.7%

    398
  • 14

    4,904 pts · 398 decks · avg 12.3 · 26.7%

    398
  • 15

    4,690 pts · 389 decks · avg 12.1 · 26.1%

    389
  • 16

    5,222 pts · 387 decks · avg 13.5 · 26%

    387
  • 17

    4,813 pts · 383 decks · avg 12.6 · 25.7%

    383
  • 18

    4,907 pts · 350 decks · avg 14.0 · 23.5%

    350
  • 19

    4,039 pts · 348 decks · avg 11.6 · 23.4%

    348
  • 20

    4,614 pts · 346 decks · avg 13.3 · 23.2%

    346

Tip jar

Back to top

If this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!

Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.