Card spotlight

Card points and play rate from registered decklists at this regional.

Showdown Series: Turniej Riftbound Tcg – Łódź · Sat, Jul 18, 2026 · Targowa 1/3, 90-022 Łódź, Polska

Players in standings

256

Everyone who appears in the standings export we used for this cut.

Decklists we used

255

Registrations where we successfully loaded a deck with at least one card.

Different cards seen

327

Unique main-deck card names across those decklists (battlefields, runes & sideboard counted separately).

Colors & domains

Domain breakdown

Pick a domain to swap the whole analysis to that color, then a support domain to drill into the exact pair — core cards, game plans, and the cards that over/under-perform.

Metagame by primary domain

Each deck counts toward the domain it plays most. Field average is 11.0 match points.

Domain	Decks	Pts share	Avg pts
Chaos	65 · 25.5%	27.4%	11.9
Calm	61 · 23.9%	23.2%	10.7
Body	49 · 19.2%	17.4%	10.0
Order	32 · 12.5%	13.9%	12.2
Fury	24 · 9.4%	9.1%	10.6
Mind	24 · 9.4%	8.9%	10.5

Mana curve · all decks

0.2

0

7.8

1

15.0

2

6.1

3

4.2

4

2.4

5

3.3

6+

Card types · all decks

Unit44.7%
Spell44%
Gear11.3%

Total match points on lists

Most match points on a card

Add up every player’s match points for each list that contains this card at least once — the heavy lifters across the field.

Points banked: 1,062
Decks: 97
Avg pts when present: 10.9 · 38% of lists

Share of loaded lists

Most lists ran it

How many distinct resolved decklists include the card at least once — your staple / saturation read.

Points banked: 1,062
Decks: 97
Avg pts when present: 10.9 · 38% of lists

Rare but winning lists

Hidden gem

Low share of lists, but players who registered it averaged higher match points than the rest of the resolved field.

Points banked: 55
Decks: 3
Lift vs event mean: +7.3 pts · event 11.0 · avg 18.3 · 1.2% of lists

Popular but cold lists

Staple under average

Showed up on a large share of lists, yet players who ran it averaged below the mean for everyone whose deck loaded.

Points banked: 527
Decks: 51
Gap under event mean: −0.7 pts vs event 11.0 · avg 10.3 · 20% of lists

Same card leads both totals and ubiquity — the defining piece of this field.

Turniej Riftbound Tcg – Łódź · resolved field

Across only the decklists we successfully loaded, players averaged 11.0 match points. Together they account for 2,810 match points in standings — that pool is what every “points banked” bar is built from (each card inherits whole-player totals, so sums across cards intentionally exceed this once).

Low share, hot lists

Hidden gems

At most ~22% of resolved lists (at least 2 players), with list averages above the field mean of 11.0 match points.

1
55 pts · 3 decks · avg 18.3 · 1.2% · ×1.0
+7.3vs event
2
52 pts · 3 decks · avg 17.3 · 1.2% · ×1.0
+6.3vs event
3
48 pts · 3 decks · avg 16.0 · 1.2% · ×2.0
+5.0vs event
4
30 pts · 2 decks · avg 15.0 · 0.8% · ×2.0
+4.0vs event
5
30 pts · 2 decks · avg 15.0 · 0.8% · ×1.0
+4.0vs event
6
30 pts · 2 decks · avg 15.0 · 0.8% · ×1.0
+4.0vs event
7
82 pts · 5 decks · avg 16.4 · 2% · ×2.8
+5.4vs event
8
81 pts · 5 decks · avg 16.2 · 2% · ×3.0
+5.2vs event

High share, cold lists

Staples below average

At least ~18% of resolved lists (min. 4 players), but list averages sit under the same field mean.

1
527 pts · 51 decks · avg 10.3 · 20% · ×2.7
−0.7vs event
2
774 pts · 74 decks · avg 10.5 · 29% · ×2.1
−0.6vs event
3
614 pts · 59 decks · avg 10.4 · 23.1% · ×2.6
−0.6vs event
4
606 pts · 58 decks · avg 10.4 · 22.7% · ×2.1
−0.6vs event
5
664 pts · 63 decks · avg 10.5 · 24.7% · ×2.4
−0.5vs event
6
584 pts · 55 decks · avg 10.6 · 21.6% · ×2.4
−0.4vs event
7
532 pts · 50 decks · avg 10.6 · 19.6% · ×1.8
−0.4vs event
8
839 pts · 78 decks · avg 10.8 · 30.6% · ×2.2
−0.3vs event

Score gravity

Top cards by points on lists

1
1,062 pts · 97 decks · avg 10.9 · 38% · ×2.9
1,062
2
1,053 pts · 96 decks · avg 11.0 · 37.6% · ×2.8
1,053
3
839 pts · 78 decks · avg 10.8 · 30.6% · ×2.2
839
4
827 pts · 74 decks · avg 11.2 · 29% · ×2.0
827
5
800 pts · 70 decks · avg 11.4 · 27.5% · ×2.8
800
6
774 pts · 74 decks · avg 10.5 · 29% · ×2.1
774
7
766 pts · 69 decks · avg 11.1 · 27.1% · ×2.9
766
8
708 pts · 62 decks · avg 11.4 · 24.3% · ×1.9
708
9
671 pts · 60 decks · avg 11.2 · 23.5% · ×2.8
671
10
664 pts · 63 decks · avg 10.5 · 24.7% · ×2.4
664
11
650 pts · 57 decks · avg 11.4 · 22.4% · ×1.9
650
12
644 pts · 59 decks · avg 10.9 · 23.1% · ×2.8
644
13
642 pts · 56 decks · avg 11.5 · 22% · ×2.1
642
14
639 pts · 55 decks · avg 11.6 · 21.6% · ×2.0
639
15
634 pts · 56 decks · avg 11.3 · 22% · ×2.3
634
16
614 pts · 59 decks · avg 10.4 · 23.1% · ×2.6
614
17
606 pts · 58 decks · avg 10.4 · 22.7% · ×2.1
606
18
590 pts · 54 decks · avg 10.9 · 21.2% · ×1.6
590
19
584 pts · 55 decks · avg 10.6 · 21.6% · ×2.4
584
20
532 pts · 50 decks · avg 10.6 · 19.6% · ×1.8
532

Ubiquity

Top cards by how many lists

1
1,062 pts · 97 decks · avg 10.9 · 38% · ×2.9
97
2
1,053 pts · 96 decks · avg 11.0 · 37.6% · ×2.8
96
3
839 pts · 78 decks · avg 10.8 · 30.6% · ×2.2
78
4
827 pts · 74 decks · avg 11.2 · 29% · ×2.0
74
5
774 pts · 74 decks · avg 10.5 · 29% · ×2.1
74
6
800 pts · 70 decks · avg 11.4 · 27.5% · ×2.8
70
7
766 pts · 69 decks · avg 11.1 · 27.1% · ×2.9
69
8
664 pts · 63 decks · avg 10.5 · 24.7% · ×2.4
63
9
708 pts · 62 decks · avg 11.4 · 24.3% · ×1.9
62
10
671 pts · 60 decks · avg 11.2 · 23.5% · ×2.8
60
11
644 pts · 59 decks · avg 10.9 · 23.1% · ×2.8
59
12
614 pts · 59 decks · avg 10.4 · 23.1% · ×2.6
59
13
606 pts · 58 decks · avg 10.4 · 22.7% · ×2.1
58
14
650 pts · 57 decks · avg 11.4 · 22.4% · ×1.9
57
15
642 pts · 56 decks · avg 11.5 · 22% · ×2.1
56
16
634 pts · 56 decks · avg 11.3 · 22% · ×2.3
56
17
639 pts · 55 decks · avg 11.6 · 21.6% · ×2.0
55
18
584 pts · 55 decks · avg 10.6 · 21.6% · ×2.4
55
19
590 pts · 54 decks · avg 10.9 · 21.2% · ×1.6
54
20
527 pts · 51 decks · avg 10.3 · 20% · ×2.7
51

Tip jar

If this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!

Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.