Legend spotlight · Unleashed

Rengar, Pridestalker

64 decks · avg 12.7 match points

← Set spotlight

Most points · Rengar, Pridestalker

Most match points on a card

Sum of pilots' match points for each Rengar, Pridestalker list containing this card.

Points banked: 813
Decks: 64
Avg pts when present: 12.7 · 100% of lists

Most played · Rengar, Pridestalker

Most lists ran it

The Rengar, Pridestalker staple — in the most of these decks.

Points banked: 813
Decks: 64
Avg pts when present: 12.7 · 100% of lists

Hidden gem · Rengar, Pridestalker

Hidden gem

Few Rengar, Pridestalker lists ran it, but those pilots beat the Rengar, Pridestalker average.

Points banked: 72
Decks: 4
Lift vs event mean: +5.3 pts · event 12.7 · avg 18.0 · 6.3% of lists

Underperformer · Rengar, Pridestalker

Staple under average

Common in Rengar, Pridestalker decks, yet its pilots fell below the Rengar, Pridestalker average.

Points banked: 112
Decks: 12
Gap under event mean: −3.4 pts vs event 12.7 · avg 9.3 · 18.8% of lists

Mana curve

0

6.1

1

13.9

2

9.8

3

4.3

4

2.0

5

2.9

6+

Card types

Unit67%
Spell30.6%
Gear2.4%

Rune base

Body7.2/deck
Fury4.8/deck

Game plans

Best avg: Aggro/Tempo (14.1 pts)

Aggro/Tempo

64.1% · 41 decks · avg 14.1

Midrange

18.8% · 12 decks · avg 9.3

Control

1.6% · 1 deck · avg 3.0

Ramp/Hold

15.6% · 10 decks · avg 11.8

How game plans are classified

A tunable heuristic reads each deck’s mana curve, unit/spell mix, and card-text keywords (removal, draw, channel/ramp), then assigns the first plan that fits — in order Aggro → Ramp → Control, otherwise Midrange:

Aggro/Tempo — low curve (avg cost ≲ 2.7), mostly units, many 1–2-cost units; pressures early.
Ramp/Hold — several channel/ramp effects with a higher curve (avg ≳ 3.2); accelerates to bigger, later plays.
Control — higher curve (avg ≳ 3) with lots of removal + card draw and few cheap units; grinds the game out.
Midrange — balanced curve and unit/spell mix; the default when no other plan fits.

Auto-includes

Core cards

Rengar, Pridestalker cards in at least half of these decks — the skeleton to start from.

1
813 pts · 64 decks · avg 12.7 · 100% · ×3.0
100%of decks
2
737 pts · 56 decks · avg 13.2 · 87.5% · ×1.9
87.5%of decks
3
710 pts · 56 decks · avg 12.7 · 87.5% · ×2.1
87.5%of decks
4
695 pts · 54 decks · avg 12.9 · 84.4% · ×3.0
84.4%of decks
5
695 pts · 54 decks · avg 12.9 · 84.4% · ×3.0
84.4%of decks
6
689 pts · 53 decks · avg 13.0 · 82.8% · ×2.9
82.8%of decks
7
677 pts · 52 decks · avg 13.0 · 81.3% · ×2.8
81.3%of decks
8
680 pts · 51 decks · avg 13.3 · 79.7% · ×2.6
79.7%of decks

Free / tech slots

Flex tech

Rengar, Pridestalker cards in a minority of decks, ranked by their pilots’ match points — the contested slots where your choices matter.

1
188 pts · 13 decks · avg 14.5 · 20.3% · ×2.8
14.5avg pts
2
94 pts · 7 decks · avg 13.4 · 10.9% · ×2.9
13.4avg pts
3
158 pts · 12 decks · avg 13.2 · 18.8% · ×2.3
13.2avg pts
4
341 pts · 26 decks · avg 13.1 · 40.6% · ×1.4
13.1avg pts
5
91 pts · 7 decks · avg 13.0 · 10.9% · ×2.3
13.0avg pts
6
91 pts · 7 decks · avg 13.0 · 10.9% · ×2.0
13.0avg pts
7
91 pts · 7 decks · avg 13.0 · 10.9% · ×3.0
13.0avg pts
8
91 pts · 7 decks · avg 13.0 · 10.9% · ×3.0
13.0avg pts

Low share, hot lists

Hidden gems

1
72 pts · 4 decks · avg 18.0 · 6.3% · ×2.0
+5.3vs event
2
188 pts · 13 decks · avg 14.5 · 20.3% · ×2.8
+1.8vs event
3
54 pts · 4 decks · avg 13.5 · 6.3% · ×1.8
+0.8vs event
4
40 pts · 3 decks · avg 13.3 · 4.7% · ×2.7
+0.6vs event
5
40 pts · 3 decks · avg 13.3 · 4.7% · ×2.3
+0.6vs event
6
94 pts · 7 decks · avg 13.4 · 10.9% · ×2.9
+0.7vs event
7
79 pts · 6 decks · avg 13.2 · 9.4% · ×2.0
+0.5vs event
8
158 pts · 12 decks · avg 13.2 · 18.8% · ×2.3
+0.5vs event

High share, cold lists

Underperforming staples

1
112 pts · 12 decks · avg 9.3 · 18.8% · ×2.1
−3.4vs event
2
290 pts · 24 decks · avg 12.1 · 37.5% · ×1.8
−0.6vs event
3
710 pts · 56 decks · avg 12.7 · 87.5% · ×2.1
−0.0vs event

Locations

Battlefields

Battlefields these decks bring, by how often they appear. (Battlefield data is still patchy and fills in as the catalog improves.)

1
9 pts · 1 deck · avg 9.0 · 1.6% · ×1.0
1.6%of decks
2
9 pts · 1 deck · avg 9.0 · 1.6% · ×1.0
1.6%of decks
3
9 pts · 1 deck · avg 9.0 · 1.6% · ×1.0
1.6%of decks

Out of the main deck

Sideboard

1
706 pts · 58 decks · avg 12.2 · 90.6% · ×2.5
90.6%of decks
2
713 pts · 53 decks · avg 13.5 · 82.8% · ×1.5
82.8%of decks
3
590 pts · 45 decks · avg 13.1 · 70.3% · ×1.6
70.3%of decks
4
614 pts · 43 decks · avg 14.3 · 67.2% · ×1.3
67.2%of decks
5
387 pts · 31 decks · avg 12.5 · 48.4% · ×1.1
48.4%of decks
6
278 pts · 21 decks · avg 13.2 · 32.8% · ×1.3
32.8%of decks
7
163 pts · 12 decks · avg 13.6 · 18.8% · ×1.2
18.8%of decks
8
133 pts · 8 decks · avg 16.6 · 12.5% · ×1.9
12.5%of decks

Score gravity

Top cards by points

1
813 pts · 64 decks · avg 12.7 · 100% · ×3.0
813
2
737 pts · 56 decks · avg 13.2 · 87.5% · ×1.9
737
3
710 pts · 56 decks · avg 12.7 · 87.5% · ×2.1
710
4
695 pts · 54 decks · avg 12.9 · 84.4% · ×3.0
695
5
695 pts · 54 decks · avg 12.9 · 84.4% · ×3.0
695
6
689 pts · 53 decks · avg 13.0 · 82.8% · ×2.9
689
7
680 pts · 51 decks · avg 13.3 · 79.7% · ×2.6
680
8
677 pts · 52 decks · avg 13.0 · 81.3% · ×2.8
677

Ubiquity

Top cards by lists

1
813 pts · 64 decks · avg 12.7 · 100% · ×3.0
64
2
737 pts · 56 decks · avg 13.2 · 87.5% · ×1.9
56
3
710 pts · 56 decks · avg 12.7 · 87.5% · ×2.1
56
4
695 pts · 54 decks · avg 12.9 · 84.4% · ×3.0
54
5
695 pts · 54 decks · avg 12.9 · 84.4% · ×3.0
54
6
689 pts · 53 decks · avg 13.0 · 82.8% · ×2.9
53
7
677 pts · 52 decks · avg 13.0 · 81.3% · ×2.8
52
8
680 pts · 51 decks · avg 13.3 · 79.7% · ×2.6
51

Tip jar

If this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!

Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.