Legend spotlight · Unleashed

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

31 decks · avg 8.3 match points

← Set spotlight

Most points · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Most match points on a card

Sum of pilots' match points for each Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness list containing this card.

Points banked: 251
Decks: 30
Avg pts when present: 8.4 · 96.8% of lists

Most played · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Most lists ran it

The Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness staple — in the most of these decks.

Points banked: 251
Decks: 30
Avg pts when present: 8.4 · 96.8% of lists

Hidden gem · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Hidden gem

Few Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness lists ran it, but those pilots beat the Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness average.

Points banked: 33
Decks: 2
Lift vs event mean: +8.2 pts · event 8.3 · avg 16.5 · 6.5% of lists

Underperformer · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Staple under average

Common in Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness decks, yet its pilots fell below the Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness average.

Points banked: 52
Decks: 9
Gap under event mean: −2.5 pts vs event 8.3 · avg 5.8 · 29% of lists

Mana curve

0.1

0

2.9

1

14.1

2

6.6

3

3.6

4

5.6

5

6.2

6+

Card types

Spell46.6%
Unit43%
Gear10.4%

Rune base

Mind6.6/deck
Order5.4/deck

Game plans

Best avg: Midrange (8.5 pts)

Midrange

51.6% · 16 decks · avg 8.5

Control

48.4% · 15 decks · avg 8.1

How game plans are classified

A tunable heuristic reads each deck’s mana curve, unit/spell mix, and card-text keywords (removal, draw, channel/ramp), then assigns the first plan that fits — in order Aggro → Ramp → Control, otherwise Midrange:

Aggro/Tempo — low curve (avg cost ≲ 2.7), mostly units, many 1–2-cost units; pressures early.
Ramp/Hold — several channel/ramp effects with a higher curve (avg ≳ 3.2); accelerates to bigger, later plays.
Control — higher curve (avg ≳ 3) with lots of removal + card draw and few cheap units; grinds the game out.
Midrange — balanced curve and unit/spell mix; the default when no other plan fits.

Auto-includes

Core cards

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness cards in at least half of these decks — the skeleton to start from.

1
251 pts · 30 decks · avg 8.4 · 96.8% · ×2.5
96.8%of decks
2
248 pts · 29 decks · avg 8.6 · 93.5% · ×2.4
93.5%of decks
3
236 pts · 29 decks · avg 8.1 · 93.5% · ×2.9
93.5%of decks
4
224 pts · 27 decks · avg 8.3 · 87.1% · ×1.7
87.1%of decks
5
229 pts · 25 decks · avg 9.2 · 80.6% · ×1.8
80.6%of decks
6
200 pts · 24 decks · avg 8.3 · 77.4% · ×2.9
77.4%of decks
7
188 pts · 20 decks · avg 9.4 · 64.5% · ×2.2
64.5%of decks
8
172 pts · 19 decks · avg 9.1 · 61.3% · ×2.4
61.3%of decks

Free / tech slots

Flex tech

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness cards in a minority of decks, ranked by their pilots’ match points — the contested slots where your choices matter.

1
78 pts · 6 decks · avg 13.0 · 19.4% · ×1.5
13.0avg pts
2
48 pts · 4 decks · avg 12.0 · 12.9% · ×1.8
12.0avg pts
3
45 pts · 4 decks · avg 11.3 · 12.9% · ×1.0
11.3avg pts
4
78 pts · 7 decks · avg 11.1 · 22.6% · ×2.6
11.1avg pts
5
63 pts · 6 decks · avg 10.5 · 19.4% · ×2.3
10.5avg pts
6
135 pts · 13 decks · avg 10.4 · 41.9% · ×1.7
10.4avg pts
7
147 pts · 15 decks · avg 9.8 · 48.4% · ×2.6
9.8avg pts
8
39 pts · 4 decks · avg 9.8 · 12.9% · ×2.3
9.8avg pts

Low share, hot lists

Hidden gems

1
33 pts · 2 decks · avg 16.5 · 6.5% · ×1.0
+8.2vs event
2
33 pts · 2 decks · avg 16.5 · 6.5% · ×1.0
+8.2vs event
3
36 pts · 3 decks · avg 12.0 · 9.7% · ×1.0
+3.7vs event
4
36 pts · 3 decks · avg 12.0 · 9.7% · ×2.0
+3.7vs event
5
78 pts · 6 decks · avg 13.0 · 19.4% · ×1.5
+4.7vs event
6
48 pts · 4 decks · avg 12.0 · 12.9% · ×1.8
+3.7vs event
7
33 pts · 3 decks · avg 11.0 · 9.7% · ×1.7
+2.7vs event
8
21 pts · 2 decks · avg 10.5 · 6.5% · ×2.5
+2.2vs event

High share, cold lists

Underperforming staples

1
52 pts · 9 decks · avg 5.8 · 29% · ×2.2
−2.5vs event
2
46 pts · 8 decks · avg 5.8 · 25.8% · ×2.4
−2.5vs event
3
46 pts · 8 decks · avg 5.8 · 25.8% · ×1.8
−2.5vs event
4
102 pts · 14 decks · avg 7.3 · 45.2% · ×1.8
−1.0vs event
5
64 pts · 9 decks · avg 7.1 · 29% · ×2.2
−1.2vs event
6
91 pts · 12 decks · avg 7.6 · 38.7% · ×1.7
−0.7vs event
7
52 pts · 7 decks · avg 7.4 · 22.6% · ×2.1
−0.9vs event
8
46 pts · 6 decks · avg 7.7 · 19.4% · ×1.2
−0.6vs event

Locations

Battlefields

Battlefields these decks bring, by how often they appear. (Battlefield data is still patchy and fills in as the catalog improves.)

No battlefields resolved for these decks yet.

Out of the main deck

Sideboard

1
197 pts · 24 decks · avg 8.2 · 77.4% · ×1.8
77.4%of decks
2
145 pts · 17 decks · avg 8.5 · 54.8% · ×1.4
54.8%of decks
3
96 pts · 11 decks · avg 8.7 · 35.5% · ×1.4
35.5%of decks
4
83 pts · 10 decks · avg 8.3 · 32.3% · ×1.3
32.3%of decks
5
86 pts · 9 decks · avg 9.6 · 29% · ×1.7
29%of decks
6
67 pts · 9 decks · avg 7.4 · 29% · ×1.7
29%of decks
7
70 pts · 8 decks · avg 8.8 · 25.8% · ×1.1
25.8%of decks
8
69 pts · 8 decks · avg 8.6 · 25.8% · ×1.1
25.8%of decks

Score gravity

Top cards by points

1
251 pts · 30 decks · avg 8.4 · 96.8% · ×2.5
251
2
248 pts · 29 decks · avg 8.6 · 93.5% · ×2.4
248
3
236 pts · 29 decks · avg 8.1 · 93.5% · ×2.9
236
4
229 pts · 25 decks · avg 9.2 · 80.6% · ×1.8
229
5
224 pts · 27 decks · avg 8.3 · 87.1% · ×1.7
224
6
200 pts · 24 decks · avg 8.3 · 77.4% · ×2.9
200
7
188 pts · 20 decks · avg 9.4 · 64.5% · ×2.2
188
8
172 pts · 19 decks · avg 9.1 · 61.3% · ×2.4
172

Ubiquity

Top cards by lists

1
251 pts · 30 decks · avg 8.4 · 96.8% · ×2.5
30
2
248 pts · 29 decks · avg 8.6 · 93.5% · ×2.4
29
3
236 pts · 29 decks · avg 8.1 · 93.5% · ×2.9
29
4
224 pts · 27 decks · avg 8.3 · 87.1% · ×1.7
27
5
229 pts · 25 decks · avg 9.2 · 80.6% · ×1.8
25
6
200 pts · 24 decks · avg 8.3 · 77.4% · ×2.9
24
7
188 pts · 20 decks · avg 9.4 · 64.5% · ×2.2
20
8
172 pts · 19 decks · avg 9.1 · 61.3% · ×2.4
19

Tip jar

If this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!

Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.