Legend spotlight · Spiritforged

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

37 decks · avg 8.9 match points

← Set spotlight

Most points · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Most match points on a card

Sum of pilots' match points for each Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness list containing this card.

Points banked: 329
Decks: 37
Avg pts when present: 8.9 · 100% of lists

Most played · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Most lists ran it

The Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness staple — in the most of these decks.

Points banked: 329
Decks: 37
Avg pts when present: 8.9 · 100% of lists

Hidden gem · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Hidden gem

Few Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness lists ran it, but those pilots beat the Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness average.

Points banked: 27
Decks: 2
Lift vs event mean: +4.6 pts · event 8.9 · avg 13.5 · 5.4% of lists

Underperformer · Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness

Staple under average

Common in Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness decks, yet its pilots fell below the Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness average.

Points banked: 151
Decks: 19
Gap under event mean: −0.9 pts vs event 8.9 · avg 7.9 · 51.4% of lists

Mana curve

0.2

0

3.2

1

14.0

2

6.6

3

2.4

4

4.4

5

8.2

6+

Card types

Spell47.5%
Unit45.1%
Gear7.3%

Rune base

Mind6.2/deck
Order5.8/deck

Game plans

Best avg: Midrange (9.5 pts)

Midrange

64.9% · 24 decks · avg 9.5

Control

35.1% · 13 decks · avg 7.7

How game plans are classified

A tunable heuristic reads each deck’s mana curve, unit/spell mix, and card-text keywords (removal, draw, channel/ramp), then assigns the first plan that fits — in order Aggro → Ramp → Control, otherwise Midrange:

Aggro/Tempo — low curve (avg cost ≲ 2.7), mostly units, many 1–2-cost units; pressures early.
Ramp/Hold — several channel/ramp effects with a higher curve (avg ≳ 3.2); accelerates to bigger, later plays.
Control — higher curve (avg ≳ 3) with lots of removal + card draw and few cheap units; grinds the game out.
Midrange — balanced curve and unit/spell mix; the default when no other plan fits.

Auto-includes

Core cards

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness cards in at least half of these decks — the skeleton to start from.

1
329 pts · 37 decks · avg 8.9 · 100% · ×2.8
100%of decks
2
326 pts · 36 decks · avg 9.1 · 97.3% · ×2.6
97.3%of decks
3
299 pts · 34 decks · avg 8.8 · 91.9% · ×2.9
91.9%of decks
4
299 pts · 33 decks · avg 9.1 · 89.2% · ×2.9
89.2%of decks
5
281 pts · 31 decks · avg 9.1 · 83.8% · ×2.0
83.8%of decks
6
257 pts · 28 decks · avg 9.2 · 75.7% · ×2.1
75.7%of decks
7
247 pts · 28 decks · avg 8.8 · 75.7% · ×2.3
75.7%of decks
8
260 pts · 27 decks · avg 9.6 · 73% · ×2.4
73%of decks

Free / tech slots

Flex tech

Renata Glasc, Chem-Baroness cards in a minority of decks, ranked by their pilots’ match points — the contested slots where your choices matter.

1
54 pts · 4 decks · avg 13.5 · 10.8% · ×2.5
13.5avg pts
2
54 pts · 5 decks · avg 10.8 · 13.5% · ×2.8
10.8avg pts
3
163 pts · 16 decks · avg 10.2 · 43.2% · ×1.9
10.2avg pts
4
142 pts · 14 decks · avg 10.1 · 37.8% · ×1.9
10.1avg pts
5
69 pts · 7 decks · avg 9.9 · 18.9% · ×2.1
9.9avg pts
6
39 pts · 4 decks · avg 9.8 · 10.8% · ×1.8
9.8avg pts
7
67 pts · 7 decks · avg 9.6 · 18.9% · ×2.0
9.6avg pts
8
118 pts · 13 decks · avg 9.1 · 35.1% · ×1.6
9.1avg pts

Low share, hot lists

Hidden gems

1
27 pts · 2 decks · avg 13.5 · 5.4% · ×1.5
+4.6vs event
2
54 pts · 4 decks · avg 13.5 · 10.8% · ×2.5
+4.6vs event
3
24 pts · 2 decks · avg 12.0 · 5.4% · ×2.0
+3.1vs event
4
36 pts · 3 decks · avg 12.0 · 8.1% · ×2.0
+3.1vs event
5
33 pts · 3 decks · avg 11.0 · 8.1% · ×2.0
+2.1vs event
6
21 pts · 2 decks · avg 10.5 · 5.4% · ×2.0
+1.6vs event
7
21 pts · 2 decks · avg 10.5 · 5.4% · ×3.0
+1.6vs event
8
21 pts · 2 decks · avg 10.5 · 5.4% · ×1.5
+1.6vs event

High share, cold lists

Underperforming staples

1
151 pts · 19 decks · avg 7.9 · 51.4% · ×1.9
−0.9vs event
2
70 pts · 9 decks · avg 7.8 · 24.3% · ×1.8
−1.1vs event
3
72 pts · 9 decks · avg 8.0 · 24.3% · ×1.6
−0.9vs event
4
150 pts · 18 decks · avg 8.3 · 48.6% · ×2.3
−0.6vs event
5
116 pts · 14 decks · avg 8.3 · 37.8% · ×2.4
−0.6vs event
6
84 pts · 10 decks · avg 8.4 · 27% · ×2.2
−0.5vs event
7
154 pts · 18 decks · avg 8.6 · 48.6% · ×2.3
−0.3vs event
8
218 pts · 25 decks · avg 8.7 · 67.6% · ×2.8
−0.2vs event

Locations

Battlefields

Battlefields these decks bring, by how often they appear. (Battlefield data is still patchy and fills in as the catalog improves.)

No battlefields resolved for these decks yet.

Out of the main deck

Sideboard

1
299 pts · 32 decks · avg 9.3 · 86.5% · ×2.0
86.5%of decks
2
215 pts · 24 decks · avg 9.0 · 64.9% · ×1.4
64.9%of decks
3
149 pts · 17 decks · avg 8.8 · 45.9% · ×1.4
45.9%of decks
4
135 pts · 14 decks · avg 9.6 · 37.8% · ×1.4
37.8%of decks
5
100 pts · 9 decks · avg 11.1 · 24.3% · ×1.3
24.3%of decks
6
84 pts · 9 decks · avg 9.3 · 24.3% · ×1.2
24.3%of decks
7
73 pts · 8 decks · avg 9.1 · 21.6% · ×2.1
21.6%of decks
8
72 pts · 7 decks · avg 10.3 · 18.9% · ×1.0
18.9%of decks

Score gravity

Top cards by points

1
329 pts · 37 decks · avg 8.9 · 100% · ×2.8
329
2
326 pts · 36 decks · avg 9.1 · 97.3% · ×2.6
326
3
299 pts · 34 decks · avg 8.8 · 91.9% · ×2.9
299
4
299 pts · 33 decks · avg 9.1 · 89.2% · ×2.9
299
5
281 pts · 31 decks · avg 9.1 · 83.8% · ×2.0
281
6
260 pts · 27 decks · avg 9.6 · 73% · ×2.4
260
7
257 pts · 28 decks · avg 9.2 · 75.7% · ×2.1
257
8
247 pts · 28 decks · avg 8.8 · 75.7% · ×2.3
247

Ubiquity

Top cards by lists

1
329 pts · 37 decks · avg 8.9 · 100% · ×2.8
37
2
326 pts · 36 decks · avg 9.1 · 97.3% · ×2.6
36
3
299 pts · 34 decks · avg 8.8 · 91.9% · ×2.9
34
4
299 pts · 33 decks · avg 9.1 · 89.2% · ×2.9
33
5
281 pts · 31 decks · avg 9.1 · 83.8% · ×2.0
31
6
257 pts · 28 decks · avg 9.2 · 75.7% · ×2.1
28
7
247 pts · 28 decks · avg 8.8 · 75.7% · ×2.3
28
8
260 pts · 27 decks · avg 9.6 · 73% · ×2.4
27

Tip jar

If this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!

Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.