Card spotlight

Card points and play rate from registered decklists at this regional.

Riftbound Challenge Gdańsk · Sat, Mar 28, 2026

Players in standings

127

Everyone who appears in the standings export we used for this cut.

Decklists we used

92

Registrations where we successfully loaded a deck with at least one card.

Different cards seen

216

Unique main-deck card names across those decklists (battlefields, runes & sideboard counted separately).

Colors & domains

Domain breakdown

Pick a domain to swap the whole analysis to that color, then a support domain to drill into the exact pair — core cards, game plans, and the cards that over/under-perform.

Metagame by primary domain

Each deck counts toward the domain it plays most. Field average is 9.7 match points.

Domain	Decks	Pts share	Avg pts
Chaos	44 · 47.8%	49.3%	10.0
Calm	18 · 19.6%	17.5%	8.7
Mind	13 · 14.1%	16.7%	11.5
Order	8 · 8.7%	8.1%	9.0
Fury	5 · 5.4%	5.2%	9.2
Body	4 · 4.3%	3.3%	7.3

Mana curve · all decks

1.7

0

6.3

1

16.2

2

4.9

3

3.9

4

1.8

5

4.3

6+

Card types · all decks

Spell46.3%
Unit38.8%
Gear14.9%

Total match points on lists

Most match points on a card

Add up every player’s match points for each list that contains this card at least once — the heavy lifters across the field.

Points banked: 413
Decks: 43
Avg pts when present: 9.6 · 46.7% of lists

Share of loaded lists

Most lists ran it

How many distinct resolved decklists include the card at least once — your staple / saturation read.

Points banked: 413
Decks: 43
Avg pts when present: 9.6 · 46.7% of lists

Rare but winning lists

Hidden gem

Low share of lists, but players who registered it averaged higher match points than the rest of the resolved field.

Points banked: 30
Decks: 2
Lift vs event mean: +5.3 pts · event 9.7 · avg 15.0 · 2.2% of lists

Popular but cold lists

Staple under average

Showed up on a large share of lists, yet players who ran it averaged below the mean for everyone whose deck loaded.

Points banked: 136
Decks: 17
Gap under event mean: −1.7 pts vs event 9.7 · avg 8.0 · 18.5% of lists

Same card leads both totals and ubiquity — the defining piece of this field.

Riftbound Challenge Gdańsk · resolved field

Across only the decklists we successfully loaded, players averaged 9.7 match points. Together they account for 892 match points in standings — that pool is what every “points banked” bar is built from (each card inherits whole-player totals, so sums across cards intentionally exceed this once).

Low share, hot lists

Hidden gems

At most ~22% of resolved lists (at least 2 players), with list averages above the field mean of 9.7 match points.

1
30 pts · 2 decks · avg 15.0 · 2.2% · ×3.0
+5.3vs event
2
43 pts · 3 decks · avg 14.3 · 3.3% · ×1.0
+4.6vs event
3
40 pts · 3 decks · avg 13.3 · 3.3% · ×1.3
+3.6vs event
4
25 pts · 2 decks · avg 12.5 · 2.2% · ×3.0
+2.8vs event
5
24 pts · 2 decks · avg 12.0 · 2.2% · ×2.5
+2.3vs event
6
24 pts · 2 decks · avg 12.0 · 2.2% · ×1.5
+2.3vs event
7
92 pts · 7 decks · avg 13.1 · 7.6% · ×2.1
+3.4vs event
8
104 pts · 8 decks · avg 13.0 · 8.7% · ×2.9
+3.3vs event

High share, cold lists

Staples below average

At least ~18% of resolved lists (min. 4 players), but list averages sit under the same field mean.

1
136 pts · 17 decks · avg 8.0 · 18.5% · ×1.8
−1.7vs event
2
218 pts · 25 decks · avg 8.7 · 27.2% · ×2.4
−1.0vs event
3
218 pts · 25 decks · avg 8.7 · 27.2% · ×2.6
−1.0vs event
4
211 pts · 24 decks · avg 8.8 · 26.1% · ×2.3
−0.9vs event
5
185 pts · 21 decks · avg 8.8 · 22.8% · ×3.0
−0.9vs event
6
149 pts · 17 decks · avg 8.8 · 18.5% · ×2.5
−0.9vs event
7
196 pts · 22 decks · avg 8.9 · 23.9% · ×2.8
−0.8vs event
8
226 pts · 25 decks · avg 9.0 · 27.2% · ×2.0
−0.7vs event

Score gravity

Top cards by points on lists

1
413 pts · 43 decks · avg 9.6 · 46.7% · ×2.7
413
2
403 pts · 39 decks · avg 10.3 · 42.4% · ×1.6
403
3
391 pts · 39 decks · avg 10.0 · 42.4% · ×3.0
391
4
390 pts · 37 decks · avg 10.5 · 40.2% · ×1.5
390
5
319 pts · 29 decks · avg 11.0 · 31.5% · ×2.7
319
6
291 pts · 28 decks · avg 10.4 · 30.4% · ×2.3
291
7
271 pts · 26 decks · avg 10.4 · 28.3% · ×2.9
271
8
259 pts · 25 decks · avg 10.4 · 27.2% · ×1.2
259
9
259 pts · 24 decks · avg 10.8 · 26.1% · ×1.8
259
10
259 pts · 22 decks · avg 11.8 · 23.9% · ×2.2
259
11
231 pts · 18 decks · avg 12.8 · 19.6% · ×2.1
231
12
229 pts · 20 decks · avg 11.4 · 21.7% · ×2.3
229
13
229 pts · 20 decks · avg 11.4 · 21.7% · ×2.1
229
14
226 pts · 25 decks · avg 9.0 · 27.2% · ×2.0
226
15
218 pts · 25 decks · avg 8.7 · 27.2% · ×2.4
218
16
218 pts · 25 decks · avg 8.7 · 27.2% · ×2.6
218
17
212 pts · 19 decks · avg 11.2 · 20.7% · ×3.0
212
18
211 pts · 24 decks · avg 8.8 · 26.1% · ×2.3
211
19
211 pts · 18 decks · avg 11.7 · 19.6% · ×2.9
211
20
209 pts · 18 decks · avg 11.6 · 19.6% · ×2.4
209

Ubiquity

Top cards by how many lists

1
413 pts · 43 decks · avg 9.6 · 46.7% · ×2.7
43
2
403 pts · 39 decks · avg 10.3 · 42.4% · ×1.6
39
3
391 pts · 39 decks · avg 10.0 · 42.4% · ×3.0
39
4
390 pts · 37 decks · avg 10.5 · 40.2% · ×1.5
37
5
319 pts · 29 decks · avg 11.0 · 31.5% · ×2.7
29
6
291 pts · 28 decks · avg 10.4 · 30.4% · ×2.3
28
7
271 pts · 26 decks · avg 10.4 · 28.3% · ×2.9
26
8
259 pts · 25 decks · avg 10.4 · 27.2% · ×1.2
25
9
226 pts · 25 decks · avg 9.0 · 27.2% · ×2.0
25
10
218 pts · 25 decks · avg 8.7 · 27.2% · ×2.4
25
11
218 pts · 25 decks · avg 8.7 · 27.2% · ×2.6
25
12
259 pts · 24 decks · avg 10.8 · 26.1% · ×1.8
24
13
211 pts · 24 decks · avg 8.8 · 26.1% · ×2.3
24
14
259 pts · 22 decks · avg 11.8 · 23.9% · ×2.2
22
15
196 pts · 22 decks · avg 8.9 · 23.9% · ×2.8
22
16
185 pts · 21 decks · avg 8.8 · 22.8% · ×3.0
21
17
229 pts · 20 decks · avg 11.4 · 21.7% · ×2.3
20
18
229 pts · 20 decks · avg 11.4 · 21.7% · ×2.1
20
19
191 pts · 20 decks · avg 9.6 · 21.7% · ×2.5
20
20
212 pts · 19 decks · avg 11.2 · 20.7% · ×3.0
19

Tip jar

If this site improved your tournament experience, help keep it going!

Suggestions welcome - tell me what you think.